The Data Politics · Analysis · Pre-registered test

Where the polls usually miss, and what to check tonight

Polls have missed in the same direction in the same states, cycle after cycle. But in midterms, the national miss has averaged about zero. Here is the test, written down before the results, and what would prove it wrong.

Published before polls closed: Not a fact-check. Polling averages as of Nov 1–2, 2026. This page will not be edited after polls close, except for a dated results note at the bottom.

The short version

From 2014 to 2024, polls underestimated Republicans in 30 of the 33 races we checked in Iowa, Kansas, Ohio, Maine and Nebraska. Four of those states hold Senate toss-ups tonight, and Democrats lead the polling average in all four. If each state misses by its usual amount, Iowa and Kansas flip to the Republican, and Ohio and Maine get close but stay Democratic.

The other side of the record matters as much. In midterms, polling misses have averaged about zero across the competitive races we checked. In 2022, polls underestimated Democrats in 11 of 14 competitive races. Over the whole period, the year mattered more than the state: misses mostly moved in the same direction everywhere at once.

Dot-and-arrow chart of eight 2026 Senate races. Each dot is the Nov 1 polling average; each arrow shows where the margin would land if the state’s average polling miss from 2014 to 2024 repeated. Iowa: D+1.7, average past miss R+4.8, lands at R+3.1. Kansas: D+4.6, past miss R+6.0, lands at R+1.4. Ohio: D+4.7, past miss R+3.8, lands at D+0.9. Maine: D+5.1, past miss R+3.9, lands at D+1.3. Texas: D+3.8, past miss R+1.5, lands at D+2.3. Alaska: D+2.9, past miss R+0.7, lands at D+2.2. Nebraska: Ricketts +0.4, past miss R+8.1. South Carolina: tied, past miss R+4.0. Only Iowa and Kansas change leader.
Dot: Nov 1 On Point Politics average. Arrow: the margin if the state’s average miss from 2014 to 2024 repeats. This is an illustration, not a forecast. * Thin data: 3 or 4 past races. Data (CSV).

The test

A miss here means the certified margin minus the final polling average. We compare tonight’s results with the Nov 1 averages in the table below.

Outcome A: the state pattern repeats

Results in Iowa, Kansas, Ohio, Maine and Nebraska come in more Republican than their polling averages, by about their usual 4 to 8 points. Iowa and Kansas are where a normal-sized miss changes the winner. Ohio, Maine, Texas and Alaska would need a bigger miss than their history shows.

Proves it wrong: three or more of those five states come in at or to the Democratic side of their Nov 1 average.

Outcome B: 2026 behaves like 2018 and 2022

The misses are close to zero or lean toward Democrats, as in the last two midterms. The Democratic leads in the polls hold or grow, including in Iowa and Kansas.

Proves it wrong: most of the eight races in the table come in more Republican than their Nov 1 average.

There is a third possibility. 2014 was a midterm too, and polls underestimated Republicans in 11 of 16 competitive races that year, by 3.0 points on average. A year like that would push every race in the table toward Republicans at once, not just the five states with a history.

We’ll check the results against this page once states certify, and add a dated note at the bottom. We will not change the numbers above.

The races to watch

StateRaceCook (Nov 2)Polling avg (Nov 1)Avg past missPast races missed toward RIf the usual miss repeats
IowaTurek (D) vs. Hinson (R), openToss UpTurek +1.7R+4.810 of 10R+3.1 (flips)
KansasHamilton (D) vs. Marshall (R)Toss UpHamilton +4.6R+6.04 of 4 (thin)R+1.4 (flips)
OhioBrown (D) vs. Husted (R), specialToss UpBrown +4.7R+3.88 of 10D+0.9
MaineJackson (D) vs. Collins (R)Toss UpJackson +5.1R+3.95 of 6D+1.3
TexasTalarico (D) vs. Paxton (R), openToss UpTalarico +3.8R+1.56 of 10D+2.3
AlaskaPeltola (D) vs. Sullivan (R)Toss UpPeltola +2.9R+0.71 of 3 (thin)D+2.2
NebraskaOsborn (I) vs. Ricketts (R)Lean RRicketts +0.4R+8.13 of 3 (thin)R+8.5
South CarolinaAndrews (D) vs. D. Graham (R)Lean RAbout tied*R+4.03 of 4 (thin)R+4.0

Averages from On Point Politics. Ratings from Cook Political Report. Sabato’s Crystal Ball rates Iowa Leans R and Kansas, Maine, Ohio, Texas and Alaska Leans D. * South Carolina: On Point lists Andrews +0.3, electoral-vote.com has Graham +2, and the latest NYT/Siena poll was 48–48 (Spectrum News, NYT). We treat it as tied. Past misses cover Senate, governor and presidential races in each state, 2014–2024.

If you count only midterm races, Iowa (R+3.8 over 5 races), Kansas (R+6.7 over 3) and Ohio (R+3.8 over 5) still show a Republican-side history. Maine shrinks to R+1.7 over 3, and Texas to R+0.4 over 5. Elsewhere, Minnesota and New Hampshire have leaned the other way: polls underestimated Democrats in 7 of 11 Minnesota races. Texas, Michigan, North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Alaska show no stable direction.

The national record

Generic House ballot: final average vs. actual House vote

MidtermRCP finalHouse voteMiss
2010R+9.4R+6.8Polls overstated R by 2.6
2014R+2.4R+5.7Polls understated R by 3.3
2018D+7.3D+8.6Polls understated D by 1.3
2022R+2.5R+2.7About right (0.2)

House vote from the Clerk of the House, via Wikipedia’s cited totals. In 2022, 538’s final average (R+1.2) underestimated Republicans by about 1.5, per a secondary source.

Competitive state races, by year

YearAverage missUnderestimated R / D (of)
2014 (midterm)R+3.011 / 3 (16)
2016 (presidential)R+2.711 / 1 (16)
2018 (midterm)R+0.24 / 5 (11)
2020 (presidential)R+3.416 / 3 (21)
2022 (midterm)D+3.62 / 11 (14)
2024 (presidential)R+2.413 / 0 (17)

Average across competitive midterm races: about 0 (41 races). Presidential years: R+2.9 (54 races). Races within 1 point count as neither. “Competitive” means the final polling margin was 10 points or less.

Method and caveats

Sources

Data checked Nov 2–3, 2026.

Results check

Pending. We will add the certified margins here, dated, after the results are in.